|
Post by Popebenedict on Jan 14, 2008 15:54:12 GMT -5
HAHAHA! four people left and the games not over. This means I was right and either Kaz or Cinders (if not both) were mafia! Now when Lamby is killed off today it will be an easy victory for us innocents as we take down the inactive Aurora! I told you a victory was very much possible.
|
|
|
Post by Prof. Cinders on Jan 14, 2008 16:14:01 GMT -5
No, it doesn't. It just means that at least one mafia member is dead - and we know that for sure anyway, since Vaxx was killed by the bullet last night. Don't jump to conclusions too fast - oh, wait, you've been doing that the whole game. Never mind.
|
|
|
Post by kazkame on Jan 14, 2008 16:36:33 GMT -5
i'm gonna put some quotes in my quote box for later humiliation
|
|
|
Post by Popebenedict on Jan 14, 2008 19:38:13 GMT -5
Only 1 is dead Cinders? Well then... lets use logic here. 2 Members of Mafia HAVE to be dead, or else the game would be called since there are only 4 people left, its impossible for them to lose. You could really say there are only 3 people left since Aurora left the game, meaning that there is only 1 mafia member left, because, once again, if there was 2 than the game would be called. Therefore, it is 2 against 1, and as long as the 2 remaining innocents choose correctly the innocents win the game. However, if for some reason your sister really isn't mafia, and we kill another innocent today, then of course the innocents will lose. So really, its up to Ocelot to decide the game here, and if he is mafia... well then they win, but if its Kuro or Lamby than there is a 50/50 chance, assuming he does not possess any OTHER knowledge that is.
Now I would like for you to show me something in my logic that is false, because I dont think you can do it.
|
|
|
Post by kazkame on Jan 14, 2008 19:58:22 GMT -5
I think people take the game to serious now. Thats why i like ocelots random post, he's having fun while other people get to technical with it. Why cant we go back to the times where you could get accused for having a pie. Sigh i'm going back to my grave to play some more phoenix wright. not towards anyone just something i wanted to use before i died.
|
|
|
Post by Popebenedict on Jan 14, 2008 20:03:36 GMT -5
Playing serious IS FUN for some of us. I dont really enjoy just making a random post from out of the blue and sticking to that person for no apparent reason. The game is fun because of the strategy, at least in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by kazkame on Jan 14, 2008 20:09:54 GMT -5
Thats your opinion but seriousness with a game ruins it in my opinion. It turns a game in to a competition. Games are for fun not for being a competative A hole. Go play a sport if you want that.
|
|
|
Post by Popebenedict on Jan 14, 2008 20:14:45 GMT -5
You see, this is because you are very simple minded, and you do not get pleasure from metal stimulation. I'm sure I enjoy these games considerably more than you do ^^
|
|
|
Post by kazkame on Jan 14, 2008 20:31:16 GMT -5
Wow Whats with the personal attack? I never said anything towards you. I'm just talking to display my views. I'm not simpled minded just because I don't enjoy mental stimulation. I prefer to do other things I get enough mental stimulation at school and like to unwind on a forum or some flash game. I enjoy the game for the intricate deaths and accusations, Not for mental stimulation. Mental stimulation is for RTS and war games, not necessarly a party game thats on a forum. ( no offense to the game but thats what it is ;D ).
|
|
|
Post by Popebenedict on Jan 14, 2008 20:35:56 GMT -5
That wasn't a personal "attack" I was simply stating a fact about you, whether you consider it negative is not my problem nor my prerogative.
|
|
|
Post by kazkame on Jan 14, 2008 20:39:05 GMT -5
Sigh wrong again pope you should go on Wheel of fortune. Thats real mental stimulation. oh I activate a trap card
|
|
|
Post by Popebenedict on Jan 14, 2008 20:43:26 GMT -5
Trust me Josh, I have to deal with you EVERY SINGLE DAY of my God forsaken life, you rather mindlessly do something. You do not get pleasure from doing intelligent things like I do. Its a fact, accept it. It's necessarily a bad quality, unless you want to make it that way.
|
|
|
Post by kazkame on Jan 14, 2008 20:47:50 GMT -5
Sigh I'm going to read a book, cuz It's actualy more entertaining than arguing with you over a game.
*Court is adjourned*
|
|
|
Post by Prof. Cinders on Jan 15, 2008 15:26:06 GMT -5
If I'm right, Pope, Mafia's played to the last man standing - that is, Mafia win when the last Innocent dies, or Innocents win when the last Mafia member dies. Even if 3 of the remaining were Mafia, the game would still not be over - as I believe the case may be, unless Auro was Innocent. Not entirely sure.
And do you not find stimulating the imagination with, I dunno, fantastical statements (like "He did it! I saw his collection of books, and one of them was just like the one that was stuffed in the victim's mouth!") more fun than full-blown arguments over tiny technical bits (like "He did it! His argument lacks conviction! I have found flaws here, here and here. And he can't even spell velociraptor.")? I pity ye.
|
|
|
Post by Vaxx on Jan 15, 2008 20:07:51 GMT -5
I'm going to have to agree with Pope on this one. I do enjoy sillyness quite a bit, but I gain most of my fun through verbal fights and battles of wit. Unfortunately, most of my classmates are sadly unarmed.
In this game I think you should make your accusations as silly as humanly possible, but you should back it up with some sort of information if asked. If you base everything off of sillyness then lots of people get mad when they wrongly die. It is quite fine with me that I am dead, since if I asked my murderer why they did it, they could probably provide me with a reason rather than saying a donut told them to do it.
|
|
|
Post by Prof. Cinders on Jan 16, 2008 12:12:48 GMT -5
But Vaxx, you got Vigilante'd. You don't get a better reason than that. >>
|
|